|
|
Post by (JK)JediEternal_Vandar on Jan 25, 2007 16:05:01 GMT -5
Klee - general and eternal i thought would be the same sort of thing - but eternal sounds better - depends what is decided about them and what command powers they are allowed to have. k?
|
|
|
|
Post by =BH=GhOsT=BH= on Jan 25, 2007 19:26:39 GMT -5
ok my idea is this ...... since we have a lot of masters we can movethem into a thing like this..... like a certain group of them will be (JK)1_JediMaster_whatevertherenameis...and 1 stands for 1st battalion then we have a group with a 2,3,4 and so on so forth..with the leaders being a 1..then next highest master are 2...then next highest group 3 and so on so forth
|
|
|
|
Post by =BH=GhOsT=BH= on Jan 25, 2007 19:28:03 GMT -5
like all the people in the clan leaders only board would be a 1 or we could do what =BH= does at the end of the name add a =00= for lower master and =09= for high masters
|
|
|
|
Post by (JK)JediMaster_Klee on Jan 25, 2007 21:40:18 GMT -5
Well whatever it is we're gonna stop ranking up for a lil unless they really havent gotten one at all. And RS if your reading this, that means you ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by (JK)JediEternal_Vandar on Jan 26, 2007 13:58:59 GMT -5
Klee i thought that General and master and eternal would me sort of the same thing. eternal sounds cool. eternal would have somethign special in the clan - i would like to be an eternal if it is decided to have one. eternal just sounds more jedi like and i am more of a jedi
|
|
|
|
Post by (JK)JediEternal_Vandar on Jan 26, 2007 17:32:17 GMT -5
How about having one or two apprentices to a master and only they can rank them up when he/she feels fit. this will lessen the masters
|
|
|
|
Post by (JK)JediMaster_Klee on Jan 26, 2007 18:20:28 GMT -5
we're doing stuff like that, but like in groups of 4
|
|
